Essay -revision-

In current world, many politic systems exist and many countries adopt democratic politic system. But, in the middle ages of Europe, absolute monarchism was adopted because of divine right of kings. This right means legitimacy and absoluteness of kings so that kings made law freely and led in a luxurious life by exploiting a lot of money from their people. In addition, people in such countries was poor because they were forced to work in land their king owned, and had to pay heavy tax. That is, they did not have chance or opportunity of leading freely life or stable life even if they had an ability like good at making something, doing business, and so on. To get big gain, Kings that age prohibited them from taking some actions, for example, kings gave privilege to a merchant which kings made favor. The reason was that king could control and monitor behavior of them easily because of only small part. Take a worse example.

In England, people rejecting unreasonable working were made to be slaves and if they made plans for escaping from their master, they were executed. Such terrible law was made by kings. To change such social environment, and to get opportunity and human right, law-status people determined and took the action. It was revolution. As a result, they achieved what they wanted by the way of knocking down their king. In short, absolute monarchism was rejected all over the world. From then, public opinion became to be essential for politic and this meant that democratic politic started. Early purpose of democratic politics was establishment of human right and free of business and this policy has been achieved.


 But, today we have concerned a lot of complicated and demanding long time problems like diplomacy, security of our nation, and economic problem. Because such discussion will not proceed with speedy, these problems have been remained for a long time and will be left to future. Why do this happen? The reason is that top of a country adopting democratic politics tend to change immediately. In addition, its term of office is short. Take an example of Japan. In Japan the maximum term of office of prime minister is four years. But between short time, five prime ministers have changed from Mr. Aso to Mr. Abe. Moreover, their policies were different. As a result, today we have faced to many troubles which are still unresolved for many years. In addition, making a charge for trivial and private problems may lead to exclude really able politician because we tend to like people apparently not having negative points. Take another example. When top of the nation change, next top person may introduce policy different from predecessor. As you know, a number of conference of TPP has done between many county, many times, many years. But when next top of the U.S was determined, he said that the U.S do not participate in this. This have led to confusion between many country. 
Also, there are too many members of the Diet. Being a larger number has led to the lack of responsibility of each person. you may watch by TV : during discussion, some of them sleep or use twitter or facebook. In short, under democratic politic system, instability of top and policies, and unclearness of responsibility exist in many points.


Next, I would like to tell positive points of these two politic system. At first, under absolute monarchy, person who have responsibility for policies is clear. Also, If top of the nation do not abuse their power, prosperity of the nation will continue long time. That is to say, stability of political aspect will be achieved. Secondly, under democratic politics, because all people have right of vote, many opinion will be reflected on. In addition, existence of dominance of law is very good to prevent the abuse of power and solve many trouble. 

From the above, politic system can be much better if positive points of absolute monarchy and democratic politics are mixed. I think that following politic system is better : top of the nation is law and the constitution, and leader is king ( anyone is good if a person who can take responsibility and know politics well is clear ), and supporter of top should be selected by equally and ordinary election. 

Reference

•http://www.biwako.shiga-u.ac.jp/eml/Ronso/397/echigo.pdf

•http://www.bbc.com/news/business-32498715

• http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/houdou/26/10/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2014/10/08/1352425_01.pdf

•http://www.y-history.net/appendix/wh1001-023.html

Presentation

-Best politic system by dialectic-
Monarchy is best politic  system.

Essay

In current world, many politic systems exist and many countries adopt democratic politic system. But, in the middle ages of Europe, absolute monarchism was adopted because of divine right of kings. This right means legitimacy and absoluteness of kings so that kings made law freely and led in a luxurious life by exploiting a lot of money from their people. In addition, people in such countries was poor because they were forced to work in land their king owned, and had to pay heavy tax. That is, they did not have chance or opportunity of leading freely life or stable life even if they had an ability like good at making something, doing business, and so on. To get big gain, Kings that age prohibited them from taking some actions, for example, kings gave privilege to a merchant which kings made favor. The reason was that king could control and monitor behavior of them easily because of only small part. Take a worse example.
In England, people rejecting unreasonable working were made to be slaves and if they made plans for escaping from their master, they were executed. Such terrible law was made by kings. To change such social environment, and to get opportunity and human right, law-status people determined and took the action. It was revolution. As a result, they achieved what they wanted by the way of knocking down their king. In short, absolute monarchism was rejected all over the world. From then, public opinion became to be essential for politic and this meant that democratic politic started. Early purpose of democratic politics was establishment of human right and free of business and this policy has been achieved.

But, today a lot of another problem exist like debt, border problem, economic depression, diplomacy and so on. What is worse, these problems have been remained for a long time and will be left to future. Why do this happen? The reason is that top of a country adopting democratic politics tend to change immediately and its term of office is short. policy being done by a prime minister or president will be stopped because of lack of time. In addition, making a charge for trivial and private problems may lead to exclude really able politician because we tend to like people apparently not having negative points. Anyway, instability of top is not good. When top of the nation change, next top person may introduce policy different from predecessor. Take an example. As you know, a number of conference of TPP has done between many county, many times, many years. But when next top of the U.S was determined, he said that the U.S do not participate in this. To put it simply, policy demanded for many years tend to be failed because of first reason I wrote. In addition, the number of problem able to be improved only a few years is very small. So, only a lot of cost and debt will be left behind and this will mean big policy can’t succeed.

Secondly, conscious of us become one of the cause. We claim policy we can get gain to candidate in election. But, this ‘we’ never means every people because we have social status or belong to social group like student, employee, age, man or female and so on. Take an example. Many student will claim free scholarship because they think the current repayment type scholarship is too high interest. In fact, many of the reason for those who quit from university are economic problems. But when they graduate from university, they belong to employee. Then, they will claim that income tax or working time should be reduced. They think even if the number of people who can’t keep studying at university has increased because of returning from free scholarship to repayment type scholarship, it is responsibility of the person. Take another example. Elder people claim that their pension or social insurance should be increased. These are based on tax like income tax or consumption tax. But, they dislike raising tax that is disadvantageous to them and require to raise the tax rate unrelated to them. That is, we can see only our own profit, and we demand it. In addition, politicians tend to think about which layer to take preferential policy to win election.

From the above, in the absolute monarchy, the king collapsed the country, democracy has fallen into mobocracy. In absolute monarchy, person with responsibility are decided, political stability is an advantage. In democracy, it is an advantage that diverse opinions are reflected, and the law stands above the king. A political system that combines these advantages would be constitutional monarch. This is the political system in which politics is most stable and smooth.

Reference

•http://www.biwako.shiga-u.ac.jp/eml/Ronso/397/echigo.pdf

•http://www.bbc.com/news/business-32498715

• http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/houdou/26/10/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2014/10/08/1352425_01.pdf

•http://www.y-history.net/appendix/wh1001-023.html

weekly journal 10

Do you know Yoshida Youichi ?

He was professor of mathematics and also published some books. 

In ''method of my reading'', he wrote ''if you can not understand content of books you read, the cause is not always in the book, but real cause is in how mature you are. In such case, there have no choice but to wait for the day when they grow up intellectually. I think that many people have a experience of realizing later how interesting a book I read before is.''

In short, to understand what you read, you need to work brain, increase knowledge, and have attitude of not giving up reading books  even if what you read is hard to understand.

WRITING -monarchy-

Economic effect under monarchy is higher than democratic politics. At first, top of a country adopting democratic politics tend to change immediately and its term of office is shoter. In this, an economic policy being done by a prime minister or president will be stopped and what worse, next top person may do opposite policy. But this policy will be cancelled. This state has repeated today's democratic nation. That is, only a lot of cost and debt will be remained behind, so bigger economic policy will be failed as you know, for example, TPP. A number of conference of TPP has done many times, many years. But when next top of the U.S was determined, he said that the U.S do not participate in this. As a result, TPP will be ended in failure. Second, democratic politics tend to have present-oriented. In short, this politic system can deal with only current economy, so policy demanded for many years tend to be failed because of first reason I wrote. In addition, the number of problems of economy being improved only a few years is very small, for example, in Japan, depression, waiting-list children, and working-poor problems and so on, as you know, these problems are not resolved. But under monarchy, top of the nation is not changed, so these two demerits will be solved thanks to stability of policy. That is, cost of money is much smaller in the long run. 


References

 ・ http://www.biwako.shiga-u.ac.jp/eml/Ronso/397/echigo.pdf
 ・http://www.bbc.com/news/business-32498715

National portrait

This is Takahashi Korekiyo. He became prime minister one time and minister of finance four times. His name is famous in economic world. In depression age of world, He succeeded in recovering economy faster than any other country  and his policy was very unique in that age, but his idea is very common today's economic world.




This is Newton. As you know, he found principle of universal gravitation. If this was not found, we could't get knowledge of the Earth and the universe. In addition, He made differential and integral calculus. He is important person in mathematical view. 

Weekly journal 9

Do you like sleeping ?
If you like long-hours sleeping, please be careful.
A organization shows that a good sleep in night is seven hours, but more sleep will bring you bad effect to your health. One example is that people who sleep for eight hours or more hours tend to die a bit sooner. If so, is less sleep than seven hours good ?
Surprisingly, it is good for us. This research shows that we really don't have to sleep for eight hours though it is said eight hours sleeping is good for us, and the result shows  proper sleeping time is six hours and between five and seven hours is good for our health. If you always have short sleeping less than five hours, it is dangerous for your health. Also, you have important work required concentration for many hours, you have to get good sleeping.